Gamergate: The (Im)perfect Storm?

Nick is here today to give his thoughts on where the consumer revolt spawned from Gamergate stands now, and his hopes for where it won't tread.

header liq gg2

I don’t think any­body ex­pect­ed Gamergate to blow up the way it did when it start­ed back in August. I don’t think any­one ever ex­pect­ed it to even be a thing in the first place. But Gamergate has be­come a storm sweep­ing over video games. One can’t help but won­der if Gamergate will be­come the hero or the vil­lain at the end of this.  Remember, these are my per­son­al thoughts and in­ter­pre­ta­tion of those thoughts based on the knowl­edge I have of this sit­u­a­tion. This is just my opin­ion on the mat­ter, from my point of view.

Many peo­ple be­lieve Gamergate start­ed on August 28th 2014 with the “Gamers are Dead” ar­ti­cles pub­lished by sev­er­al out­lets. But I be­lieve there has been a silent un­der­ground out­cry of re­sis­tance go­ing all the way back to Dewrito‐gate and the Mass Effect 3 end­ing de­ba­cle. I think it was around this time that de­vel­op­ers and pub­lish­ers felt it was a more vi­able mar­ket­ing scheme to in­vest mon­ey into mar­ket­ing to the press in­stead of try­ing to mar­ket to the much larg­er au­di­ence of con­sumers. There’s no deny­ing they prob­a­bly saved a lot of mon­ey mar­ket­ing to a small­er group and let­ting the press han­dle the con­sumers, but in do­ing so they gave the press more con­trol than they should have had. I think this is tru­ly the start­ing point where a need for Gamergate arose.
liquid insert 1

With this shift in mar­ket­ing, I think it came to bring a sense of en­ti­tle­ment to the press. They came to be gate­keep­ers be­tween devs and con­sumers. The press be­came the ones who de­cides what and who reach­es the con­sumers eyes and ears. Once the press be­came more fo­cused on pol­i­tics in­stead of the in­dus­try it­self they ul­ti­mate­ly came to hurt a lot of de­vel­op­ers. We came into an era where devs were re­quired to have enough mon­ey be­hind them to buy cov­er­age or forced to toe a po­lit­i­cal line to earn cov­er­age from the press. With these hap­pen­ings, the un­der­ground rum­blings that would lat­er be­come Gamergate grew.

These things I men­tioned — and many more that I won’t here for brevi­ty [Editor Note: See our Death of Games Journalism se­ries] — ul­ti­mate­ly lead to the fat­ed “Gamers are Dead” day that un­in­ten­tion­al­ly caused the ex­plo­sion of an­gry con­sumers known as Gamergate. And in these past ten months, which feels like sev­er­al years in in­ter­net time, we’ve seen mas­sive changes from in­die scene all the way up to the AAA de­vel­op­ers. It’s much like sit­ting on the edge of your seat, bit­ing your nails, won­der­ing what will sur­vive and what won’t in this mas­sive storm. But one thing’s for sure go­ing for­ward. Games jour­nal­ism as it is, is dead. The mass of con­sumers in this in­dus­try have spo­ken and have said, “No, we will not be in­sult­ed or slan­dered, we will be treat­ed with due re­spect, and we will be heard.” The games press is now left with a de­ci­sion. Either re­form to these new height­ened ex­pec­ta­tions or to die out in the storm they had a hand in mak­ing.

There are def­i­nite­ly risks go­ing for­ward, though. Things that are still un­fore­seen, and things we can only hope do not hap­pen. But these things call for a good dis­cus­sion go­ing for­ward. One of the big wor­ries with any in­dus­try chang­ing event is: in­stead of true re­form you end up with a mere ex­change of pow­er. It is im­por­tant that once the storm has made its due course and passed over that we do not turn into the things we fought against.

As was once quot­ed by ac­tor Aaron Eckhart:

You ei­ther die a hero or you live long enough to see your­self be­come the vil­lain.”

liquid insert 2

It is a very slip­pery slope, but Gamergate as a whole does have sim­i­lar up­bring­ings as so­cial jus­tice as a move­ment. The ide­olo­gies be­hind them vast­ly dif­fer, but both felt their way of do­ing things was for the greater good of every­one, both found a means of gain­ing pow­er to en­force these changes they felt need­ed to hap­pen, and both have yet to put down the pow­ers it is wield­ing. Granted, Gamergate is still in full swing at this point, but it is very im­por­tant that once this is all over, Gamergate be re­spon­si­ble enough to put down this pow­er as to not turn into the thing it’s fight­ing against. The worst thing that could hap­pen, I be­lieve, is Gamergate mere­ly be­comes the vil­lains of gam­ing it is fight­ing so hard thwart.

Now I’m sure some might shrug off these no­tions that Gamergate could be­come the thing it fights against. But just as this storm brewed from sev­er­al sources that most nev­er ex­pect­ed to go to­geth­er in this once in a life­time event, it is pos­si­ble that this storm might not die and just changes course. All it re­al­ly takes is enough peo­ple in Gamergate get­ting drunk on pow­er — much the same way so­cial jus­tice did — and refuse to put down this pow­er they are wield­ing and in­stead di­rect it to­wards an­oth­er cause.

The cy­cle could con­tin­ue much the same way so­cial jus­tice still wields its pow­er. No longer for no­ble caus­es, but for per­son­al gain and to keep those they do not agree with be­low them in a so­cial con­struct with foun­da­tions in guilt and sham­ing.

There are oth­er things Gamergate needs to ac­com­plish as well be­fore it can put down its pow­er — for good hope­ful­ly.  For ex­am­ple: ad­dress­ing the pub­lish­ers and de­vel­op­ers that ul­ti­mate­ly abused the press for fa­vor­able cov­er­age and hope­ful­ly han­dling the mi­nor­i­ty of gamers that do, in fact, give gam­ing a bad name with all their vit­ri­ol and hate. But it is im­por­tant, as a level‐headed Gamergate sup­port­er, that we use this pow­er we have achieved with re­spon­si­bil­i­ty and in the in­ter­est of all, not just our­selves. This is a mas­sive op­por­tu­ni­ty to change not only video games, but the world as a whole for the bet­ter. Don’t let that slip through our fin­gers by be­com­ing what we fight.

(Disclaimer: The opin­ions ex­pressed in this ar­ti­cle are the author’s own and do not nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sent those of the SuperNerdLand.com staff and/or any con­trib­u­tors to this site.)

The fol­low­ing two tabs change con­tent be­low.
Nick Soderholm
Nick is a graph­ic de­sign­er, up­com­ing stream­er, and all around busi­ness helper. Will wreck you with Ibuki. Will also like­ly piss you off, don’t take it per­son­al.
Nick Soderholm

Latest posts by Nick Soderholm (see all)

Scroll to top