Global Developers, Global Gamers: Progressive Racism and the American‐Centric Universe

John is here with his Global Develpers, Global Gamers series. Today touching on progressive racism in how the PC crowd handles European Culture.

Centric header

America has a prob­lem. It does not seem to re­al­ize the rest of the world ex­ists. Those who con­sid­er them­selves en­light­ened, mod­ern and pro­gres­sive have de­vel­oped a blind‐spot to their own bur­geon­ing racism, big­otry and au­thor­i­tar­i­an stances on art that comes from oth­er cul­tures. We’ve seen it in­creas­ing­ly hap­pen to Japanese games, but the most re­cent vit­ri­ol and hys­te­ria has cen­tered around games from Central and Eastern Europe.

There was a wave of protest, and even veiled threats, against de­vel­op­ers such as the team be­hind The Witcher 3 be­cause the eth­nic make­up of their games were be­ing judged by pure­ly American stan­dards. Polygon’s Tauriq Moosa wrote an ar­ti­cle en­ti­tled “Colorblind: On The Witcher 3, Rust, and gaming’s race prob­lem” laugh­ably miss­ing the point that the Polish are them­selves a mi­nor­i­ty group. There was also the be­lat­ed follow‐up by Leigh Alexander’s failed ex­per­i­ment, OffWorld, en­ti­tled “Video games with­out peo­ple of colour are not ‘neu­tral’” which went fur­ther, deny­ing the rights of CD Projekt Red to their cul­tur­al her­itage and Slavic mythol­o­gy. The idea that there is some­how a de­fault “right” way to do a game and deny a neu­tral blank can­vas is an in­sipid way for many who wrap them­selves in “American pro­gres­sivism” to try and bat away dif­fer­ent ideas they find un­palat­able.

centric side 1I have strong words for the writ­ers of these ar­ti­cles; they are a cul­tur­al colo­nial­ist im­pos­ing their pa­tron­iz­ing views on an en­tire sec­tion of Europe. Both Sidney Fussel and Tauriq Moosa re­gard Polish de­vel­op­ers like the ear­ly European ex­plor­ers re­gard­ed oth­er cul­tures. Backwards sav­ages to be civ­i­lized; sex­ist and racist brutes that need to hear the good word of Social Justice and amend their art to re­flect the pro­gres­sive whims. They op­er­ate on the same prin­ci­ple as those in the past who want­ed sex and vi­o­lence ex­punged from me­dia. It comes from the po­lit­i­cal left rather than the po­lit­i­cal right this time, but the mode of op­er­a­tion re­mains the same.

Developers, in their own words, have tried to get this idea of cen­sor­ship from the left across — of­ten very ar­tic­u­late­ly and gra­cious­ly — and have been met with pret­ty frank in­sults and at­tacks. What do we call some­one who lash­es at out those at­tempt­ing to ex­plain their cul­ture and his­to­ry? We call them a closed mind­ed big­ot. There is a sub­tle racism at play with­in these ed­i­to­ri­als; the theme that there is one sin­gle block of “White peo­ple” in the world. Despite be­ing sep­a­rat­ed by ge­og­ra­phy, lan­guage and vast­ly dif­fer­ent his­to­ry.

Patryk Kowalik, a Polish de­vel­op­er for the game Elysian Shadows, penned this thought­ful re­ply to Americans de­mand­ing racial quo­tas in videogames. The un­com­fort­able truth is that be­ing Polish is an un­com­fort­able type of “White” for the rich so­cial­ists in American uni­ver­si­ties to ad­dress with their “Critical Race the­o­ry.” The Polish are a dis­tinct eth­nic group that has suf­fered un­de­ni­able hard­ship and op­pres­sion — real op­pres­sion — eas­i­ly shown over the past cen­tu­ry:

Three sov­er­eign pow­ers took Polish lands for over 100 years and tried to erase pol­ish lan­guage and cul­ture. The coun­try briefly re­gained in­de­pen­dence af­ter WW1, only to lose it af­ter WW2, when it be­came com­mu­nist puppet‐state with wide­spread cen­sor­ship where his­to­ry was al­tered, art po­liced and every po­lit­i­cal opin­ion was dan­ger­ous one. That end­ed only 25 years ago.  But hey, why stop only on his­to­ry – Poles are still dis­crim­i­nat­ed against in mod­ern Europe” 

As some­one who lives in the EU, and has trav­eled with­in it, I can tell you first hand the dis­crim­i­na­tion Polish im­mi­grants have faced. Especially with­in the UK where Polish im­mi­gra­tion lev­els has been high over the past decade. When you don’t live in the American “pro­gres­sive” bub­ble you be­gin to see just how xeno­pho­bic their ideas are and how au­thor­i­tar­i­an their meth­ods of ac­cu­sa­tion and sham­ing re­al­ly are.

He went on to say:

To peo­ple from mul­tira­cial coun­tries, de­mand­ing racial di­ver­si­ty in video game might seem like some­thing good, a pro­gres­sive thing. However the game is not just any game, it’s Witcher. Game made in coun­try which bat­tled through his­to­ry to main­tain it’s own her­itage and lan­guage, game which builds upon slav­ic mythol­o­gy and pro­motes it in­ter­na­tion­al­ly. You’re try­ing to shoe­horn for­eign el­e­ments into their cul­ture, en­force your own stan­dards onto theirs. In case I haven’t ham­mered my point down strong­ly enough: you have peo­ple of a mi­nor­i­ty cul­ture that were per­se­cut­ed and dis­crim­i­nat­ed against in last 250 years, who made this awe­some work of art that rep­re­sents them, and you’re telling them to change it be­cause it’s not American enough.”

That’s the crux of the is­sue. This isn’t di­ver­si­ty, this isn’t tol­er­ance –- this is a group of spoiled writ­ers say­ing “these games do not re­flect my own cul­tur­al and po­lit­i­cal sen­si­bil­i­ties, change them or I’ll call you racist, sex­ist or ac­cuse you of be­ing a Neo‐Nazi.” And yes, that last part has hap­pened; mul­ti­ple out­lets re­port­ed the false ru­mour that the de­vel­op­ers of the game Hatred, Destructive Creations, were some­how linked to Neo‐Nazi groups be­cause a mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tion of a sym­bol on a team-member’s t‐shirt.

centric insert 1

Turns out the de­vel­op­er was wear­ing a Cursed Soldiers em­blem, a sym­bol of re­sis­tance against the en­forced com­mu­nist regime the Polish en­dured — a sym­bol of na­tion­al pride. These ac­cu­sa­tions were sourced from a Tumblr post by “Fuck NO Video Games,” an anony­mous in­di­vid­ual who has launched mul­ti­ple at­tacks on Gamers, jour­nal­ists and Developers — all of which be­ing as poor­ly sourced as this shame­ful in­de­cent. Never the less, this ac­count has gained trac­tion on both Tumblr and Twitter, be­ing shared and ref­er­enced by many Games Journalists in their des­per­ate bid to halt con­sumer ac­tions against them.

The Website “Player Attack” even ac­knowl­edged in its com­ments sec­tion their ar­ti­cle was poor­ly sourced and fac­tu­al­ly in­cor­rect and yet their head­line of “Hatred is the neo‐Nazi hate‐crime of video games” still re­mains to slan­der and stain (and draw in clicks).

centric insert 2

This is what will­ful cul­tur­al mis­un­der­stand­ing does: it turns a de­vel­op­er wear­ing a sym­bol of his forefather’s re­sis­tance into hys­te­ria about “Fascists.” The “Eastern European Skin‐Head” is it­self an ugly and out­dat­ed stereo­type. Poland is a mod­ern Central European na­tion and the por­tray­al of its game de­vel­op­ment as back­ward, ig­no­rant and racist by jour­nal­ists sourc­ing big­ots on Tumblr is the real racism in these in­stances. This also back­fired spec­tac­u­lar­ly, cat­a­pult­ing Hatred to the top of the Steam charts af­ter so much at­ten­tion was giv­en to it by those try­ing to un­fair­ly tear it down.

The irony is that those ex­pos­ing the virtues of di­ver­si­ty and tol­er­ance the loud­est are the ones who are spread­ing a mod­ern form on in­tol­er­ance and mob‐rule where the cre­ative vi­sion and cul­ture of de­vel­op­ers is sac­ri­ficed for in­creased uni­for­mi­ty. Fellow Polish de­vel­op­er Adrian Chmielarz summed it up well:

It’s hard to have a ra­tio­nal, nu­anced dis­cus­sion on di­ver­si­ty these days. For ex­am­ple, if you be­lieve Poles have the right to make a game that is es­sen­tial­ly Polish, you’re an ig­no­ra­mus who lit­er­al­ly de­hu­man­izes the peo­ple of col­or. Because di­ver­si­ty ap­par­ent­ly means ho­mog­e­niza­tion.”

centric side 2There is this push to make all en­ter­tain­ment this safe, mock UN box tick­ing ex­er­cise where cre­ative vi­sion is re­placed by pla­ca­tion and pan­der­ing. In cre­at­ing a game that is cul­tur­al­ly Polish, these devs have in­ad­ver­tent­ly come into con­flict with the American po­lit­i­cal cor­rect­ness po­lice. We used to joke about per­cent­age quo­tas for gen­der and race in me­dia but now the idea is be­ing pre­sent­ed with a straight face, a press blitz, and a social‐media mob to back it up. If you look at the USA and Europe and you only see a uni­form set of cul­tur­al­ly iden­ti­cal “White peo­ple” then you might just be a closed‐minded fool ig­no­rant of any ves­tige of cul­ture and his­to­ry.

The cen­tre of this prob­lem seems to be ar­ro­gance. A group of writ­ers think­ing they know some­one else’s cul­ture bet­ter than they do. Progressives as­sum­ing they can “fix” some­thing to make it less of­fen­sive — not re­al­iz­ing that in the process they are ask­ing for artists to strip‐out what rep­re­sents them and their iden­ti­ty. You can’t judge the rest of the world by America’s hang‐ups on race and sex. Not every­where has the same mix of peo­ple, ideas or the same his­to­ry that America does, and part of di­ver­si­ty is rec­og­niz­ing that art and me­dia has dif­fer­ent con­text in dif­fer­ent cul­tures. In pre­sum­ing they are the ar­biters of tol­er­ance they have be­come some of the most in­tol­er­ant peo­ple in the videogame land­scape. They have set up a sys­tem where every­thing re­volves around their own po­lit­i­cal sen­si­bil­i­ties and in do­ing so have set out on a cru­sade to un­der­mine the cul­tur­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion of oth­ers and de­val­ue and dis­miss their ideas.

This new pro­gres­sive racism needs to be shown for what it is and blunt­ed, be­fore it caus­es more mis­ery to game de­vel­op­ers just try­ing to re­al­ize their vi­sion with­out bow­ing to the stan­dards of a small clique of priv­i­leged American jour­nal­ists and out of touch slack­tivists.

The fol­low­ing two tabs change con­tent be­low.
John Sweeney
John Sweeney is a ter­ri­bly British man with a back­ground in en­gi­neer­ing. He writes long‐form ed­i­to­r­i­al con­tent with analy­sis of gam­ing, games me­dia and in­ter­net cul­ture. He also does the oc­ca­sion­al video game ret­ro­spec­tive with a week­ly col­umn about Magic the Gathering thrown in for good mea­sure. He also does most of our in­ter­views for some rea­son, we have no idea why. A staunch sup­port­er of free speech and con­sumer rights; skep­ti­cal of agen­da dri­ven me­dia and sus­pi­cious of un­ac­cou­table au­thor­i­ty but al­ways hope­ful for change.
Scroll to top