Old Ideas & A New Games Media: An Interview With TechRaptor Founder Rutledge Daugette

An interview with TechRaptor founder Rutledge Daugette about games journalism, gamers and the changing media landscape.

TR int head

How did TechRaptor first get start­ed? I know you of­ten get ac­cused of be­ing a “GamerGate” site but if I’m not mis­tak­en you’ve ex­ist­ed in some form since 2013.

I start­ed writ­ing about games in late 2012 for a cou­ple of small sites as well as blog­ging about tech events and com­put­er fix­es on my own blog for fun. After do­ing it for a few months and re­al­ly tak­ing the time to get well versed in how every­thing runs, I re­al­ized that there was more of a prob­lem that I had al­ready thought at that point. I al­ready knew there were is­sues with games jour­nal­ism, hav­ing grad­u­at­ed with a de­gree in Game Programming, but I didn’t re­al­ize the ex­tent.

So in 2013, I dou­bled down and bought a ba­sic serv­er, do­main name, and got start­ed with build­ing TechRaptor into a site that I could be proud to vis­it per­son­al­ly, as well as one that would re­al­ly fol­low the ba­sic tenets of ethics and in­tegri­ty.

Since then, we’ve had more than 170 dif­fer­ent peo­ple write for the site over time, 3.75 mil­lion pageviews, and re­al­ly ex­pand­ed our vol­ume and qual­i­ty of con­tent.


TR side 1In the past year TechRaptor has ex­pand­ed quite no­tice­ably; what are the chal­lenges in­volved in try­ing to break into the realms of big­ger pub­li­ca­tions? 

It’s al­ready re­al­ly tough to get new peo­ple to vis­it the site, but then you have to work to get them to come back day af­ter day. When there’s a ton of sites to com­pete with, many of whom are in­cred­i­bly well es­tab­lished, it’s a mat­ter of find­ing things that will make us stand apart.

I think the biggest chal­lenge is be­ing pa­tient. From the start, I told my­self – “This will take time, don’t get dis­cour­aged.” I think this re­al­ly helped me set the men­tal­i­ty that I’ll have to work hard every day to keep chang­ing and im­prov­ing TechRaptor to grow.

The biggest thing I’ve learned is to lis­ten to our read­ers. I look at all the tweets, com­ments, and more, in hopes that I can glean one more thought or idea that will help us make that next big step.

What do you most look for in a games writer or con­tent cre­ator? 

First and fore­most, we’re look­ing for writing/video skill and tal­ent, and then “Voice”. What I mean by this, is that we’re look­ing for peo­ple who are skilled with writ­ing or video cre­at­ing, but can take that skill and tell a sto­ry. Even in our news pieces, we’re not look­ing to just re­gur­gi­tate in­for­ma­tion or re­view points, we want to make sure we’re ex­plain­ing things in a way that peo­ple will both un­der­stand and en­joy read­ing.

Past that, I’m look­ing for peo­ple who want to help the site grow. We’re still small with around 300,000 pageviews a month, and while we are slow­ly grow­ing our pay with our fol­low­ing, I want peo­ple who are look­ing for a place where they can grow and im­prove with us, both in vis­i­bil­i­ty and com­pen­sa­tion.

Do you think writ­ing about games and cre­at­ing me­dia about games has changed in the past year? 

Without a doubt. I mean, look at YouTube and Twitch, and how in­te­gral they’ve be­come to gamers learn­ing about the games they love through Let’s Play’s and video re­views.

I think peo­ple are look­ing for con­tent and peo­ple they can con­nect to. In the past, we saw a lot of re­al­ly dry press re­lease news bits, and as time goes on you’re see­ing more cus­tom news pieces with ex­tra de­tails and for some sites like ours, com­men­tary at the end. It’s why we’re work­ing to cre­ate new columns and se­ries that will run week af­ter week, al­low­ing read­ers and sub­scribers to con­nect to our staff.

How im­por­tant is read­er ac­count­abil­i­ty to you? Can you ever lis­ten to crit­i­cal voic­es TOO much? 

Hah, you can DEFINITELY lis­ten too much. Personally I spend a lot of time read­ing the com­ments, tweets, face­book posts, and a few emails, every month be­cause I love be­ing crit­i­cized. For a site that wants to im­prove it­self and build a true com­mu­ni­ty, tak­ing crit­i­cism and us­ing it to make your­self bet­ter is what you have to do.

At the same time, lis­ten­ing to every piece of crit­i­cism is too much. You have to know what’s too nit‐picky, what’s trolling, and what’s some­thing that will move your com­mu­ni­ty for­ward.

In the last few months your site hasn’t been shy in flirt­ing with con­tro­ver­sy, do you think that gam­ing sites are over­ly averse to risk or too fear­ful of back­lash?

I think the whole world is too fear­ful of back­lash. It’s the sites that say what they mean, al­low their writ­ers to be hon­est, and di­verse opin­ions to be shown, that will con­tin­ue to grow and pros­per as their reader­base gets to know them.

TR insert 1

I want my writ­ers to be hon­est, cov­er things that are im­por­tant to them, and in­ter­act in an hon­est way with our read­ers. If we share what we’re pas­sion­ate about with the world, peo­ple are go­ing to come and join us. We want to cre­ate a com­mu­ni­ty around TechRaptor, and that’s not go­ing to hap­pen if we don’t take risks and be com­plete­ly hon­est.

What kind of games writ­ing and me­dia would you per­son­al­ly like to see more of? 

Thematic me­dia, hon­est­ly. At TechRaptor, we have the news and re­view space pret­ty well han­dled, and we’re work­ing to im­prove it every day. Something go­ing on be­hind the scenes right now, though, is that we’re work­ing to start pro­duc­ing some the­mat­ic con­tent. For those that don’t know, the­mat­ic con­tent is sto­ry dri­ven. For ex­am­ple, hav­ing D&D ad­ven­tures, and the­mat­i­cal­ly writ­ing up a ses­sion re­port like a sto­ry. I think that’s some­thing our read­ers will re­al­ly en­joy.

Do you think video gam­ing con­tent will ever ful­ly re­place writ­ten gam­ing con­tent? 

If we’re say­ing 100% – no way. I think that over time, it may be­come more one sided as peo­ple look to video re­views and the like, but I just can’t see writ­ten gam­ing con­tent go­ing away. There’s just so much you can do with the writ­ten word that you can’t with a video.

There has emerged the idea of the “en­thu­si­ast press”, gamers writ­ing for each oth­er, do you will tra­di­tion­al games writ­ing has a place still?

I think that “en­thu­si­ast press” is a cat­e­go­ry that we’ve fall­en un­der for a while now, but we’re work­ing to be­come a pro­fes­sion­al out­let as well. The dif­fer­ence I see is that “tra­di­tion­al” press does it as a day job, and “en­thu­si­ast press” does it for fun or as a side job. One day, we’d like to have an of­fice and peo­ple on staff full time. That’s the goal.

So with that in mind, I def­i­nite­ly think that “tra­di­tion­al” games writ­ing will have a place for a while – it may just evolve a bit.


TR side 2Do you think pub­li­ca­tions could do more to pro­mote de­vel­op­er voic­es that are of­ten left out of the con­ver­sa­tion?

Yes and no. There are a seem­ing­ly end­less num­ber of de­vel­op­ers out there, so it’s hard for us to hunt down and cov­er every sin­gle one (as much as we’d love to!) so we have to pick and choose what we as in­di­vid­u­als want to re­view and what we think our read­ers would want to see.

But, I think it’s just as im­por­tant for de­vel­op­ers to make sure they take the time to do PR and con­tact sites with a good, sol­id PR email. Too many de­vel­op­ers have is­sues mak­ing a sol­id first con­tact, gen­er­al­ly leav­ing out de­tails or in­for­ma­tion that will make them stand out!

How do new and emerg­ing sites dif­fer­en­ti­ate them­selves from the old mod­el of games jour­nal­ism? 

New and emerg­ing sites need to go back to the roots of games jour­nal­ism – pas­sion and com­mu­ni­ty.

What I mean by that, is that the roots of jour­nal­ism were deeply root­ed in a pas­sion for, and love of games. Mix that with a re­spect be­tween jour­nal­ists and gamers, and you’ll see a com­mu­ni­ty grow as they in­ter­act and share their love for games, tech, and more.

It all comes down to know­ing who you’re writ­ing for, be­cause you’re there to ser­vice your read­ers, not the oth­er way around. If new and emerg­ing sites can share their pas­sion while re­spect­ing their read­ers, you’re go­ing to see them grow.

TechRaptor has a com­pre­hen­sive code of ethics, does up­hold­ing a high stan­dard present a large fi­nan­cial bur­den?

I’m not sure if large is the cor­rect work, but it def­i­nite­ly cuts our po­ten­tial rev­enue by at least 50%. We up­hold both our ethics poli­cies, and any guide­lines like those re­quired by the FTC. As such, we say no to a lot of un­eth­i­cal prac­tices such as non‐disclosed spon­sored posts and while they’re not re­al­ly un­eth­i­cal – pop up and video ads.

It sucks, but if we want to build a site that’s found­ed on ethics and a pas­sion for games, tech, table­top, and build­ing a com­mu­ni­ty – we want to make sure that we do the right thing every time.

Plus, we care about our read­ers, so we don’t want to do any­thing to mis­lead them.

Why do you think many gam­ing sites have been slow or un­will­ing to adopt even ba­sic ed­i­to­r­i­al stan­dards?

My mon­ey would fall on the fact that be­cause of how games jour­nal­ism came into be­ing, that these sites got so in­grained and used to be­ing top dog and do­ing things their way, they just don’t want to change.

My num­ber one rule, and some­thing I’ve no­ticed with a lot of com­pa­nies, is that if you don’t change and evolve with the times – you won’t stay suc­cess­ful for long.

And last but most im­por­tant­ly of all, who do you think would win in a fight be­tween a Pirate and a Ninja?

Ninja’s all day.

The fol­low­ing two tabs change con­tent be­low.
John Sweeney
John Sweeney is a ter­ri­bly British man with a back­ground in en­gi­neer­ing. He writes long‐form ed­i­to­r­i­al con­tent with analy­sis of gam­ing, games me­dia and in­ter­net cul­ture. He also does the oc­ca­sion­al video game ret­ro­spec­tive with a week­ly col­umn about Magic the Gathering thrown in for good mea­sure. He also does most of our in­ter­views for some rea­son, we have no idea why. A staunch sup­port­er of free speech and con­sumer rights; skep­ti­cal of agen­da dri­ven me­dia and sus­pi­cious of un­ac­cou­table au­thor­i­ty but al­ways hope­ful for change.
Scroll to top